ASYA’DA EĞİTİM / TYPOGRAPHY FIDELITY STUDY

Reference first.
Weight second.

One typeface, not new brand directions. Six Turkish weights and four English weights, independently measured against the original.

B REJECTED · A NOT APPROVED · NO WINNER SELECTED

01 / VISUAL AUTHORITY

The original. Not a font specimen.

This JPEG governs weight, proportions, counters and spacing. B is rejected. Previous A at 700 is unapproved and superseded by these experiments.

Original supplied typography reference
Original file, unchanged · 1012 × 558 · no enhancement.

02 / ORIGINAL MEASUREMENTS

Two weight roles, measured separately.

LineFlat capVertical stemV / capHorizontal stemH / capGlyph ink density
ASYA’DA140 px28.00 px0.20024.00 px0.17145.2%
EĞİTİM139 px23.00 px0.16522.00 px0.15847.3%
EDUCATION IN ASIA35 px5.00 px0.1434.00 px0.11439.9%

Neutral ink L<140, approximately 50% edge coverage; original pixels, no interpolation. Approximately ±1 native pixel uncertainty, especially significant on 35px English caps. Vertical probes: D/E/I/T/M/N/U stems. Horizontal probes: E arms, T bar (off-centre), A crossbar. Density is mean filled fraction inside non-I glyph ink boxes (I is excluded because its filled rectangle always reads 100%), not an approval score.

Glyph proportions, counters and measured gaps
Glyph / rowWidth / capWidth / heightCounter bounds (px)Ink density
A / tr1-00.9930.99334.0 × 39.040.7%
S / tr1-10.6790.669No enclosed counter53.8%
Y / tr1-20.8570.857No enclosed counter35.5%
A / tr1-30.9860.98634.0 × 39.040.6%
D / tr1-40.8070.80757.0 × 87.060.5%
A / tr1-50.9930.98635.0 × 40.040.5%
E / tr2-00.7340.734No enclosed counter57.3%
G / tr2-10.9210.895No enclosed counter47.6%
I / tr2-20.1580.158No enclosed counter99.8%
T / tr2-30.7770.777No enclosed counter33.5%
I / tr2-40.1660.166No enclosed counter99.9%
M / tr2-50.9930.993No enclosed counter50.8%
E / en-00.6860.686No enclosed counter50.7%
D / en-10.8570.85720.0 × 26.046.0%
U / en-20.7710.771No enclosed counter38.9%
C / en-30.8290.829No enclosed counter34.1%
A / en-40.9430.94311.0 × 15.033.2%
T / en-50.7710.771No enclosed counter29.5%
I / en-60.1430.143No enclosed counter98.9%
O / en-71.0001.00025.0 × 27.037.4%
N / en-80.8290.829No enclosed counter48.7%
I / en-90.1430.143No enclosed counter99.4%
N / en-100.8000.800No enclosed counter48.5%
A / en-110.9430.94311.0 × 15.034.6%
S / en-120.6860.686No enclosed counter43.0%
I / en-130.1430.143No enclosed counter95.4%
A / en-140.9140.91412.0 × 15.034.6%

TR1 visible gaps: 27, 22, -4, 65, 26 px. Original ink measure 880 px.

TR2 visible gaps: 58, 80, 64, 62, 80 px. Original ink measure 865 px.

EN visible gaps: 31, 31, 31, 28, 23, 29, 31, 30, 68, 33, 66, 28, 31, 29 px. Original ink measure 855 px.

Requested common width: 881px. Original TR2 and English measures differ, so unified specimens necessarily change spacing; the glyphs never stretch. A negative Y/A bounding-box gap need not mean actual ink collision.

03 / TURKISH · ONE TYPEFACE, SIX WEIGHTS

Compare the weight, then the shape.

Same source flat cap heights: 140px / 139px. Guides mark the shared flat-cap and baseline. Jost’s pointed A/M overshoots are retained and reported, not compressed. Every original/candidate pair uses the identical pixel scale; scroll horizontally on narrow screens. Blue ink overlays the unchanged original at exactly 50% opacity.

Jost 400Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 400 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 400, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 400 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 17.00px (-11.00 vs source), horizontal 16.00px (-8.00), glyph density 31.5%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 400 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 400, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 400 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 17.00px (-6.00 vs source), horizontal 15.81px (-6.19), glyph density 36.3%.

Jost 450Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 450 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 450, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 450 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 20.50px (-7.50 vs source), horizontal 18.00px (-6.00), glyph density 35.5%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 450 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 450, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 450 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 20.25px (-2.75 vs source), horizontal 18.50px (-3.50), glyph density 40.8%.

Jost 500Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 500 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 500, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 500 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 24.25px (-3.75 vs source), horizontal 20.00px (-4.00), glyph density 39.0%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 500 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 500, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 500 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 23.50px (+0.50 vs source), horizontal 21.12px (-0.88), glyph density 44.9%.

Jost 550Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 550 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 550, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 550 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 26.75px (-1.25 vs source), horizontal 21.50px (-2.50), glyph density 41.4%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 550 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 550, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 550 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 26.25px (+3.25 vs source), horizontal 23.00px (+1.00), glyph density 47.7%.

Jost 600Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 600 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 600, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 600 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 29.25px (+1.25 vs source), horizontal 22.50px (-1.50), glyph density 43.5%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 600 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 600, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 600 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 28.50px (+5.50 vs source), horizontal 24.81px (+2.81), glyph density 50.3%.

Jost 650Turkish experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL / TR1
Original tr1
JOST 650 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 650, tr1, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 650 over original tr1

TR1: vertical 32.00px (+4.00 vs source), horizontal 24.25px (+0.25), glyph density 45.7%.

ORIGINAL / TR2
Original tr2
JOST 650 / COMMON WIDTH 881
Jost 650, tr2, identical cap height
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scale50 percent blue Jost 650 over original tr2

TR2: vertical 31.00px (+8.00 vs source), horizontal 26.81px (+4.81), glyph density 53.0%.

04 / ENGLISH · SEPARATE LIGHT-WEIGHT STUDY

A distinct, lighter role.

200 / 250 / 300 / 350. All 35px caps, identical scale. If the measured source lies outside this range, it is reported—not forced to fit.

Jost 200English experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL ENGLISH
Original English
JOST 200 / CAP 35 PX
English Jost 200
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scaleEnglish Jost 200 overlay

Vertical 1.75px (-3.25); horizontal 1.75px (-2.25); density 15.8%.

Jost 250English experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL ENGLISH
Original English
JOST 250 / CAP 35 PX
English Jost 250
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scaleEnglish Jost 250 overlay

Vertical 2.25px (-2.75); horizontal 2.00px (-2.00); density 20.3%.

Jost 300English experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL ENGLISH
Original English
JOST 300 / CAP 35 PX
English Jost 300
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scaleEnglish Jost 300 overlay

Vertical 2.75px (-2.25); horizontal 2.75px (-1.25); density 24.7%.

Jost 350English experiment · not selected

ORIGINAL ENGLISH
Original English
JOST 350 / CAP 35 PX
English Jost 350
Show 50% transparent overlay · same scaleEnglish Jost 350 overlay

Vertical 3.50px (-1.50); horizontal 3.25px (-0.75); density 30.1%.

05 / GLYPH FIDELITY

Changing weight cannot change every letterform.

Original first, then six Turkish weights. G: body alone; Ğ: original breve included. Left-ink/baseline aligned at source cap height, no width normalization. Zoom uses real outlines, not upscaled tracing.

A · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
S · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
D · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
G · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
M · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
Ğ · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650
İ · original / 400 / 450 / 500 / 550 / 600 / 650

06 / REVIEW-ONLY LOCKUPS

Strong Turkish. Lighter English.

Measured-stem review subset: Turkish [500, 550]; English [300, 350]. Two closest sampled stem matches per role—not approved candidates. Shape fidelity remains unresolved. All 24 pairings remain available; changing a preview is not a selection.

Preview only; no winner selected.

Unselected horizontal lockup with canonical seal
Unselected stacked lockup with canonical seal

Open vector wordmark ↗

Exact 400:370 seal geometry, fixed across trials. Established 85px gap / 44px padding. Offset previews move only the wordmark relative to the fixed seal; positive values move it downward. The previous alternatives stay untouched: historical alignment review. No alignment chosen.

07 / LIMITATIONS & VERIFICATION

No claim of exact fidelity.

Jost cannot reproduce this reference by weight changes alone. The actual rendered comparisons show:

  • A: Jost has a pointed, taller apex instead of the source’s small flat top; the triangular counter is larger/taller at 500. The source counter is 34×39px versus 38×44px at 500. The crossbar thickness/height also differs.
  • S: Jost is wider and its upper/lower bowl balance and terminal cuts differ. The source is compact, with a fuller spine; increasing weight changes density but not the same silhouette.
  • D: Jost’s bowl/counter is more open. At 500 the counter is about 69×96px versus the source’s 57×87px. The source stem is 28px; Jost 500 is about 24px.
  • G: decisive structural mismatch: the source has a squared return and vertical inner edge below the bar; Jost continues around a circular lower-right bowl. Jost’s body is also wider: about 141px at 500 versus 128px.
  • M: decisive structural mismatch: the source has upright outer stems, flat shoulders and a blunt central junction. Jost has splayed sides, pointed high shoulders and a sharp lower V. At 500 it is about 153px wide versus 138px.
  • Ğ: inherits G’s mismatch. Jost’s breve is deeper and sits higher than the shallow source cup; its dimensions change with weight.
  • İ: the dot is real and present, but its size and clearance differ by weight. Around 500 the dot is roughly 27×26px versus about 24×24px in the thresholded source.

English: all requested samples remain thinner than the original under the same measurement method. Jost 350 is closest within this set (vertical ≈3.5px vs source ≈5px; horizontal ≈3.25px vs ≈4px), but is not an exact weight match. This is visible as well as measured. The source is still lighter than Turkish in stem/cap ratio and apparent size; that does not mean its font weight number must be 200–350 in Jost.

No single sampled Turkish weight matches both rows perfectly. The source’s D stem in TR1 is about 28px; its E/I/T/M stems in TR2 are about 23px. The 500/550 subset is only an advisory compromise, not a winner. Clean font contours are necessary but do not establish fidelity.

Muse multimodal advisory review: independently flagged A/M/G structure, weight mismatch and English underweight after inspecting the actual rendered comparisons. Not approval. Review and factual reconciliation.

Body proportions: original / review samples

GlyphSource W/HJost 500 W/HJost 550 W/HSource counterJost 500 counter
A0.9930.9290.94434.0 × 39.038.0 × 44.0
S0.6690.6890.703openopen
D0.8070.8380.85057.0 × 87.068.8 × 95.5
G0.8950.9780.983openopen
M0.9931.0461.063openopen

Widths and heights are actual ink bounds at the shared flat-cap scale, not normalized square glyphs. Jost’s A/M pointed overshoots remain visible; they have not been flattened or compressed.

HUMAN TYPOGRAPHY REVIEW PENDING

Full measurements, gaps, ratios and manifests (JSON) · Independent final-SVG verification (JSON) · Jost SIL OFL licence · Historical rejected/unapproved study